Click here for the HSLDA NV Legislation Monitoring Page

********************************************

6/12/2019 – LEGISLATIVE session ends – homeschool freedom remains intact.

NV ESA program is scrubbed and removed from NV statutes. Governor Steve Sisolak signs SB 551 that among other things REPEALED the Nevada ESA law.  See Section 39.5 of the bill.

• SB 551 was a bill to fund the NV state government.  It was introduced and passed in the final days of the 2019 NV legislative session with little opportunity for public input.

• NHN has updated our education options chart, Nevada Parental Choice Options.2019.June reflecting the change in the law and current level of freedom from government intervention in the education choices parents may the make for their children.

• NHN is wary of government funded (taxpayer’s money) “school choice” programs IF they impact the freedom of NV parents to homeschool their children as they see fit without “government approval.”  For more information on how the NV ESA impacted NV homeschool freedom see – Homeschooling vs. Government “school choice.“

**************************************************

NV Legislature  to study “home visits” for “at risk” mothers and children during the 2019/2020 Interim Session

National articles on why government “home visits” are unconstitutional and problematic

Evidence-Based Home Visiting Programs – Rodger Williams, Researcher – Homeschooling Backgrounder 4/8/19

Here Comes Big Brother: Home Visiting Laws Threaten Parental Rights Nationwide – Karen Ephram, MD, The National Pulse 4/8/19

Home Visit Legislation: A Sales Pitch For Family Surveillance? – Wrench in the gears: A Skeptical Parent’s Thoughts on Digital Curriculum 2/17/2019

_________________________________________________

4/24/2019 – AB 430 – 1st Reprint passes in the NV Assembly – bill moves to the State Senate.

The bill has been changed to a “study” on home visit programs during the 2020 Interim Session.  However, we remain concerned that the word “voluntary” is not used in reference to home visits.

• What is fueling these programs?  The federal government.
  • “In February 2018, the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program was allocated $400 million per year through fiscal year 2022. On September 20, 2018, HRSA awarded approximately $361 million in funding to 56 states, territories, and nonprofit organizations to support communities in providing voluntary, evidence-based home visiting services through the Maternal, Infant, and Early Childhood Home Visiting Program. By law, state and territory grantees must spend the majority of their grants to implement evidence-based home visiting models, with up to 25 percent of funding available to implement promising approaches that will undergo rigorous evaluation.” https://mchb.hrsa.gov/maternal-child-health-initiatives/home-visiting-overview 
• So the key is that any “home visit” program should always be voluntary on the part of the “at risk” identified participant.

4/16/2018 – Here’s what happens when government officials fail at their job and look for a scapegoat: Keeping Children Safe produced by TEACH-CT (Connecticut).

• Identifying “risk factors” in parents as a deterrent to child abuse denies families a presumption of innocence… there must be substantiated probable cause of abuse/neglect to warrant intrusion into a family’s home by the government.  Even doing a study of “government home visits” that AB 430 now calls for is without merit.  Offer taxpayer funded programs that parents can CHOOSE to avail themselves of if they want… but entering the home without cause must never be granted to DCSF or any other government entity.

4/12/2018 – AB 430 was amended – changing the bill to a “study” of home visits during the 2020 interim session.

The amended bill received a “Do Pass” from the Assembly Health and Human  Services committee.  The bill goes back to the Assembly Floor but may be redirected to Assembly Ways & Means since studies cost money.  The study will be more limited in scope than the original bill BUT it still all about setting up home visits by government officials for “at risk” families.  NHN remains opposed to AB 430, see letter submitted 4/11/19.

4/11/2019 – AB 430, Amended will have a “work session” in Assembly Health & Human Services Committee on 4/12 at 12:30. 

NHN submitted the following letter in opposition to both the original bill and the amendment.

AB430.NHN ltr to Assm HHS 4.11.2019

4/10/2019 – Your Voices Were Heard!!!

Assembly Speaker Jason Frierson sponsor of AB 430, the “home visits” for certain “at risk” families has agreed to a proposed amendment by Assemblywoman Shea Backus to change the bill to a “study” during the 2020 Legislative interim on home visits/services for at risk families with any new proposal to be heard in 2021.
https://www.leg.state.nv.us/…/ExhibitD…/OpenExhibitDocument…

The key for us in the future will be that any “home visit” program offered by the state be VOLUNTARY with no penalty or record kept of parents choosing not to participate.

4/9/2019 – NV Legislative Alert!

AB 430 – Government mandated home visits for “at risk” new parents to be heard in committee.

Wednesday, 4/10/2019 – Assembly Committee on Health and Human Services Agenda

March 28, 2019  

NEVADA LEGISLATIVE ALERT – CALL TO ACTION 

 AB 430 threatens fundamental parental rights of some Nevadans

(printable version:  AB430.2019.Legislative Alert.Call to Action)

By way of introduction, Nevada Homeschool Network (NHN) advocates for Nevada families who have chosen to direct the education of their children via homeschooling.  We also advocate for the fundamental parental rights of all parents.  In this capacity, we are writing today about AB 430.

Our concerns:

• This bill will mandate government “home visits” for certain “at risk” Nevada citizens with newborns and young children. In so doing the 4^th Amendment Rights[1] and fundamental parental rights[2] of these parents will be violated without probable cause.
• Placing government mandated “home visits” under the Division of Child and Family Services (NV-DCFS) is problematic and will add additional casework to an already overburdened bureaucracy.
• There will be a fiscal impact on state and county budgets to implement this new “service.”
• “Appropriately trained professionals” is ambiguous and worrisome.
• The scope and time-frame a family would have to submit to NON-voluntary home visits is not defined.
• The “risk factors” defining families who are to “receive services” via home visits is discriminatory.

Conclusion:

AB 430 is vaguely written and as such threatens the constitutional rights of Nevada citizens.  Further, there is no credible research showing that what works in a “voluntary” environment will work in a “coercive” environment as required by this bill.  This bill is an overreach and without merit as introduced. NHN is OPPOSSED to AB 430.

CALL TO ACTION: 

First, this bill DOES NOT impact homeschool freedom in Nevada. There is no need for you to even mention that you are a homeschooler.  Instead, we are concerned about the constitutional rights of all NV parents.

The bill has been referred to Assembly Committee on Health and Human Services.  It has not been given a hearing date at this time.  For now, please share in your OWN words your opinion on this bill  on the Legislation Opinion page (don’t just copy & paste our concerns and conclusion, that is not effective and actually makes you comment TOO long – thanks); https://www.leg.state.nv.us/App/Opinions/80th2019/.

We also encourage you to contact your NV State Assembly-person and let them know what you think about AB 430.  You can find your legislator by clicking this link; http://mapserve1.leg.state.nv.us/whoRU/ .

Thanks for participating in your government!

Elissa Wahl, NHN Chairwoman – Las Vegas, NV

Matt Alder, NHN Vice-Chairman/Treasurer – Reno, NV

NHN Officers:  Kelley Millard Radow, Secretary – D. Raymond Poole, Officer – Aaron Sutherland, Officer – Kristi Casaus, Officer – Maureen Ford, Provisional Officer

Barbara Dragon, Officer Emerita

[1] The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

[2] NRS 126.036 – https://www.leg.state.nv.us/NRS/NRS-126.html#NRS126Sec036

Other States with similar “non-voluntary home visits” legislation:

Minnesota: https://cplaction.com/cpl-article/minnesota-home-visits-an-opportunity-to-herd-our-children/

Oregon: https://www.oceanetwork.org/study-on-home-visits-in-oregon-sb-526/?fbclid=IwAR2fusi4rC3g9qMcrXj9GkYR_LZcKYZLWGtWHemkBuQh-h5xeJNTI2Ra7sE

**********************************************************************************************

February 22, 2019 –  NHN is watching for bills threatening homeschool freedom in Nevada… nothing so far but check back regularly for updates.

Also keep an eye on our NHN Facebook page.

And/or sign up for free NV-Alert emails

Become a member or make a donation to support the advocacy work NHN does for Nevada homeschool families year-round.  Thank you!

Federal legislation has been introduced by Senator Ted Cruz (Texas) – again – encouraging states to implement a “tax-credit scholarship organization” program where donors receive a tax credit on their federal income tax.  The scholarship money will be distributed to K-12 aged children who meet eligibility requirements established by the state to receive education from various entities.  The Education Freedom Scholarship Act, if passed by Congress, may be a good thing for families who need financial assistance to find alternative education options for their children. Our concern is whether it could lead to more government control of private schools and homeschools.

Only time will tell.

This article in The Daily Caller published on Senator Cruz’ Facebook page denotes a red flag for us here at NHN.

• “The Education Freedom Scholarship and Opportunity Act would provide a $10 billion annual federal tax credit for taxpayers who donate to state-based scholarships. These scholarships would afford families the ability to expand their children’s choice of elementary and secondary education, including private and home education, special education services and therapies, and summer, after-school, and tutoring programs.”
• “It gives states the choice to opt-in, rather than requiring nationwide participation and yields flexibility to determine how to structure its programs, including what schools and students are eligible.”

Education Secretary Betsy DeVos takes it further in her Prepared Remarks by Secretary DeVos at the unveiling of the Education Freedom Scholarships proposal!***see 5/29/2019 addendum below.

• “And let’s stop and think about what public education really is. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis recently said it well: “If the taxpayer is paying for education, it’s public education.” He’s right! And if the purpose of public education is to educate the public, then it does not matter what defining word comes before school. Because education isn’t about school buildings or school systems. Education is about school children.”

This statement is of concern because it hints that all education provided to children should be “public education” or could be interpreted in such a manner by future administrations.  NHN holds that parents, not the government, are ultimately responsible for the education of their children, including the financing of said education.  States may “provide for public schools and other options” as put forth in state constitutions but that doesn’t mean government should be the only providers of education.  Nor should government dictate what education for the individual child is to look like.

Based on Nevada’s homeschool history of government over-regulation and what has happened more recently with the non-operational NV-ESA and NV-Choice/Opportunity Scholarship (a business tax-credit program introduced by Governor Sandoval in 2015 and over-regulated by the NV-DOE the same year) – we are concerned NV state government would seek to control the education of a student utilizing such scholarship funds.

“Innovation, voluntary collaboration, and an entrepreneurial spirit fuel the engine of the homeschooling movement.” (JimMason, HSLDA). Private schools and homeschoolers need to always be cognizant of possible drawbacks to government education programs.  Often government sponsored education programs only offer “choice” with “accountability” and not the freedom to educate children according to the independent standards of the private school and/or parents.

Having said all this however, our friends at HSLDA have come out in support of the bill.  NHN has worked with HSLDA since our founding in 2002 as did other Nevada homeschool organizations dating back to 1983.  We value and trust their opinion!  Key to their statement is the following:

• “Some of the ways states could expand students’ access to educational opportunities include dual enrollment, tutoring, summer education programs, advanced and remedial courses, special education services and therapies, and private and home education.The bill also includes strong religious liberty protections. It explicitly prohibits any federal control over participants.The bill’s language ensures that if a state chooses to join the program, officials cannot then refuse to include religious, private, and homeschool SGOs or attempt to regulate them. Secretary DeVos stated that the “key element of the proposal is freedom,” and crafters of the bill ensured that, while expanding educational freedom, it did not curtail other liberties.”

HSLDA gives the example of a program for low-income families in New Hampshire that is working well for families to choose homeschooling without increased government regulation (though homeschooling in NH is considered “moderately” regulated as compared to Nevada’s “low” regulation).  NHN reviewed the New Hampshire program back in 2014 and found it to be a beneficial program for some families.  Giving families a choice in the education provided to their children is a good thing.

In reviewing the current federal bill ourselves, we are encouraged by strong protective language barring states choosing to implement the program from controlling the private school or homeschool beyond existing state statutes.  Section 102, Subsection (d)(3-5) on pages 9-11 of the proposed legislation – as written – seems to adequately protect both private schools and homeschools within this state to operate without further intrusion by federal or state government.  Modification of this section by amendment if the bill moves forward would of course need be watched carefully.

In our experience here in Nevada private, self-funded homeschool freedom is put at risk every legislative session as these programs are added, changed or updated according to the whims of politicians and government bureaucrats.  We want to believe the best but will always view government “help” with a skeptical eye.

To clarify, Nevada Homeschool Network (NHN) advocates for the right of parents to direct the education of their child.  We strive to guard the freedom of each family to educate their own children as they see fit and pay for it themselves! To that end, keeping the NV homeschool law separate from any government approved/funded program has always been, and will continue to be, a goal for NHN. We support parents’ right to choose the best education option for their children – even a government sponsored program – as long as parents who prefer private, self-funded homeschooling free from government controls always have the LIBERTY to do so.

Several organizations that we also respect have voiced their objections to The Education Freedom Scholarship Act.  We find many of their arguments compelling and encourage everyone to read these as well.  Liberty assures that we are free to make up our own minds after reading both sides of an issue.

• Federalizing School Choice Could Be Trump’s Common Core – Inez Feltscher Stepman, The Federalist 2/27/2019
• Even Something as Great as School Choice Should Not Be Federalized – Neal McCluskey, CATO Institute 2/28/2019
• Betsy DeVos Unveils Federalized School Choice Plan – Dr. Susan Berry, Brietbart 2/28/2019
• Why A Federal School Choice Program May Be The Dumbest Way For Trump To Promote School Choice – Joy Pullman, The Federalist 3/4/2019

Other articles in support:

• 3/14/2019 – DeVos scholarships would give control to parents, not bureaucrats – Quin Hillyer, The Washington Post.

Addendum – 5/29/2019:  The link to the DeVos quote above is broken or gone – of course.  However, she restated her ridiculous logic in May 2019 and was quoted in this article, Ed Secretary DeVos: All Education is “Public” Education by Alex Newman, Freedom Project  Media 5/28/2019.  To avoid “losing” a  direct link again, we’re posting the full article:

• “U.S. Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos called for redefining all forms of education as “public” education, an idea with potentially catastrophic implications for educational liberty and true school choice.

  The rhetoric was especially troubling in light of DeVos’ efforts to provide federal funding for government-controlled “choice” under the guise of “school choice.” Her brazen dishonesty relating to Common Core, as well as her inking a globalist deal on education with fellow G20 education bosses, should also alarm anyone concerned with freedom and real education.

  The speech in question, given at the Reagan Ranch while speaking at the neoconservative-leaning Young America’s Foundation on May 17, sparked alarm among educators and education researchers. And it is easy to see why.

  “Let’s stop and rethink the definition of public education,” she said. “Today it is often defined as one type of school funded by taxpayers, controlled by government. But, if every student is part of the public, then every way and every place a student learns is ultimately of benefit to the public,” DeVos continued. “That should be the new definition of public education.”

  Of course, if every form of education is “public” education because it benefits “the public,” it follows that “the public” is entitled to some say over that allegedly “public” education. And that is exactly where DeVos and others pushing this agenda are going.

  And DeVos has been a leading advocate of phony “school choice,” which would see federal tax dollars going to fund private schools and potentially even homeschoolers. The dangers of this unconstitutional idea are hard to overstate.

  Consider: With federal funding comes federal control. And just as state funding such as “vouchers” has resulted in formerly independent schools having to ban the Bible and teach Common Core, so too will this DeVos-backed “choice” result in government hijacking all education. The Supreme Court has agreed that what the feds fund, they can regulate.

  The dictator-controlled United Nations “Human Rights Council” passed a resolution in 2015 demanding that governments worldwide crackdown and regulate non-government education, even calling for the same “standards” to be imposed on both. That is the real agenda.

  Last year, The Newman Report exposed DeVos’ agreement with mass-murdering regimes and other G20 governments to facilitate the ongoing “internationalization” of education. The same deal also purported to commit the signatories to advancing the totalitarian ideology of “sustainable development” through “education.”

  The staggering implications of DeVos’ statements and schemes must be understood clearly as a direct assault on educational freedom. It is past time to shut down the unconstitutional U.S. Department of Education and get the feds out of schools completely. Advocates of true school choice must turn up the heat or risk losing educational freedom in the years ahead.”

And we’ll leave you with these words from history:

“The nine most terrifying words in the English language are: I’m from the government and I’m here to help.” – President Reagan Aug. 12, 1986

A recent Georgia Court of Appeals decision overturning a lower court’s restriction of homeschooling gives homeschool freedom advocates reason to cheer.  The Chief Judge on the Court, Stephen Dillard, wrote a concurring opinion that give historic context to the right of parents to direct the education of their children without government interference. Click the title or the link to read Mr. Eugene Volokh’s article on this important court decision and the judge’s own words.

Constitutional Right to Home-School?

An interesting opinion from a Georgia Court of Appeals chief judge Stephen Dillard.

Eugene Volokh|Oct. 23, 2018 11:15 am – https://reason.com/volokh/2018/10/23/constitutional-right-to-home-school